Concrete Ratio.RESEARCH & PRODUCT DECISIONS

Research dossier / September 2026

Concrete mix design:
a more transparent laboratory.

What useful software and authoritative guidance teach us about showing the science behind every mixture.

16 software referencesWeb · mobile · producer QC · scientific tools
India-first, international contextIS workflow · accessible manuals · original research
6 September 2026Evidence, limits and implementation decisions

The decision

Build a workspace that connects requirements, material data, proposed proportions and measured trials. A useful result explains which quantities changed, what remained fixed, and which project limit governed the outcome. The strongest opportunity is an understandable experimental workflow, rather than another grade-to-ratio lookup.

This review covers 16 representative software tools and accessible standards, manuals, publisher previews and original research. It is broad coverage across web, mobile, producer QC and scientific software, not an inventory of every application worldwide. Paid applications were not installed or tested. Paid books were consulted only through legitimate previews or publisher pages; access limits are recorded below. Sources were accessed on 6 September 2026.

The homepage remains an India-first IS 10262:2019 preliminary proportioning tool for normal-weight, non-air-entrained M10–M60 concrete. International methods inform the workflow; they are not silently mixed into the IS engine. There is no universal perfect recipe: constituent properties, workability, exposure, variability, curing and measured performance change the feasible design.

What the evidence changes

Make the control’s promise explicit

Changing a ratio has different consequences depending on what is fixed. At fixed free water, binder demand is W/r. At fixed binder, water is rB. Minimum content and exposure limits can prevent the requested condition; the interface must show the requested and actual values. CME documents these alternative modes, while Stonemont illustrates constrained blend objectives and comparisons. Our fixed-quantity experiment is an implementation decision inferred from those workflows. CME 2024 manual · Stonemont mix design

Separate a calculated scenario from a tested batch

NIST COST designs experiments, asks the user to perform physical batches and tests, and then analyzes the entered outcomes. ACI describes calculated proportions as starting approximations requiring laboratory and field verification. These support separate scenario and measurement records, not automatic approval from a generic strength curve. NIST COST, updated 2022 · ACI PRC-211.1-22 preview, §§1.3 and 3

Show moisture as a mass balance

The meaningful chain is oven-dry solids → SSD design mass → wet batch mass → free-water contribution → mixer-added water. Total moisture and absorption must share the oven-dry basis. For the error experiment, holding the original wet ticket weights fixed means actual dry-solids delivery changes too. Our diagnostic therefore does not apply a correction at the same time it illustrates the error. BRE BR 331 preview, §§1.2.1–1.2.3 · FHWA proportioning training, archived

Grading fit is one objective, not proof of good concrete

The FHWA-sponsored grading brief explains why idealized grading or minimum voids need not improve workability. It also motivates a percent-retained view, which exposes concentrations and gaps hidden by cumulative passing. We retain explicit target-fit residuals and add size-fraction bars; neither is labeled packing density or strength. Ley and Cook, Aggregate Gradations for Concrete Pavement Mixtures, 2014, pp. 1–3

Software landscape

Capabilities below are supported by vendor documentation or official research descriptions. They have not been validated by executing the products. Undated pages had no visible publication date. Legacy research descriptions establish historical methods, not current installer availability.

Software landscape
Tool and evidenceRelevant capabilityLesson and limitation
Sika Mix Design App · Sika, undatedDirect sieve-curve editing, mix/test association, batching cards and exportsCombine graph manipulation with numeric controls. Free access is country-dependent; LCA and Shotcrete add-ons were labeled coming soon.
Solvebility calculator · Solvebility Engineering Team, updated 6 July 2026Visible inputs, calculation log, trial comparison and CSV/printGood explanation placement. A published water-adjustment example contains an arithmetic inconsistency, so it is not used as numerical authority.
StonemontQC · Stonemont Solutions, undatedTrial/final mixes, SSD/dry entry, constrained blending and several grading chartsShow objectives, constraints, proposed results and comparisons together. Edition-dependent commercial features; no licensed access.
Concrete Quality · Concrete Quality SLU, undatedMaterials, laboratory records, traceability, statistical tools and benchmarkingAttach material/test provenance to results. Advertised standards customization was not audited.
COMMANDqc · Command Alkon, undatedMixes, materials, tolerances, testing and batch monitoringExpose governing limits and review needs. Marketing savings claims are not transferable predictions.
Marcotte Batch · Command Alkon, undatedMoisture calibration and visual production/batching controlExplain ingredient and water delivery. This is production software, not a public proportioning calculator.
SmartMix / Roxi · Giatec Scientific, undated FAQMix versions, grading, measured breaks, yield flags and historical-data optimizationTie recommendations to a material family and actual records. Roxi is the engine within the product, not a separate calculator.
Concrete Mix Evaluator · Gary Knight, undated product page; 2024 manualFixed-water/fixed-binder modes, multiple aggregates, admixture-water accounting and saved mixesExplicitly state what the solver knows. The manual does not claim to derive binder needed for a strength target without the designer’s material relationship. Excel/Solver required.
STADIUM Mix Design · SIMCO Technologies, undatedSpecialist packing-based formulation using constituent propertiesPacking models require more information than a curve-fit error. Presented as a tool used by SIMCO experts; not inspected as a public calculator.
Concrexis / ConcreteInfo · ConcreteInfo, visible v4.0, undatedMaterials → mix → trials → tests → reports; versioned QA recordsGood workflow reference. App calculations and automatic conformity claims were not verified; design-link access failed.
Concrete Mix · AppsGear, updated 27 December 2021Separate design, estimation, nominal-mix and conversion modulesKeep quantity estimation distinct from engineering proportioning. Listing explicitly uses IS 10262:2009; not a current IS2019 reference.
Concrete Mix Design IS-10262 · eigenplus, updated 4 May 2024Ingredient quantities, volumes, rates and visible design stepsMake derivations easy to find. Exact code edition was unspecified; developer listing only, app not installed.
COMPASS · FHWA, November 2007; page updated 2017Job criteria, material selection, grading, proportioning and optimization modulesOrganize the process around requirements. Historical pavement software; current support was not verified.
COST · NIST/FHWA, created 2013, updated 2022Experimental plans and optimization using user-performed trial resultsStrong model for the proposed-versus-measured boundary. Live executable not tested.
VCCTL 9.5 · NIST, updated 2021Characterized materials, hydration and property simulation with calibrationScientific simulation needs stated models and material characterization. Experimental software with predictive and legacy-environment limits.
BétonlabPro / BétonlabFree · IFSTTAR/LCPC, undated page identifying 2008 releasesConstituent characterization, property intervals, formulation and physical adjustmentA solver should admit no feasible result. Modern compatibility and support were not established.

The suggested “Alta Cement” reference could not be identified as a scientific mix tool. UltraTech’s official home-building tools were checked, but do not establish a public scientific mix optimizer matching that description.

Standards, manuals and books: what was actually reviewed

Standards, manuals and books: what was actually reviewed
Source / editionAccess and location reviewedWhat it supports
IS 10262:2019 · BIS, second revisionBIS-authored full text on a third-party host; ordinary/standard workflow and §5.8 checked, including PDF page 8Absolute-volume proportioning and trial iteration. Trial 2 revises water/admixture at the preselected ratio; additional trials vary that ratio about ±10% at the revised water. Actual materials and field trials govern finalization.
IS 456:2000 source text · BISBase text used for selected durability checks; not a complete current amendment auditMinimum content, maximum ratio and grade checks within the engine’s declared scope. Verify official amendments and project conditions separately.
ACI PRC-211.1-22 · ACI Committee 211, July 2022Six-page official preview, printed pp. 3–4; not full paid guideAbsolute-volume starting proportions and laboratory/field verification. Excludes several specialty concrete families.
Design of Normal Concrete Mixes, BR 331, second edition · Teychenné, Franklin, Erntroy et al., BRE, 1997Official nine-page preview; foreword, contents and introductionLocal-material evidence, target mean strength and absorbed/free/mixer-water distinctions. Historical UK provisions are not current project limits.
Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures, seventeenth edition · PCA / American Cement AssociationPublisher overview and contents only; year not verified on that pageBroad learning architecture: constituents, proportioning, durability, handling, curing and testing. No coefficients were taken from unread chapters.
Integrated Materials and Construction Practices for Concrete Pavement, second edition · CP Tech Center, May 2019Publisher documentation and indexed excerpt; full 11 MB PDF retrieval failedReading-list context. Publisher identifies chapter 7 for proportioning; no complete chapter review is claimed.
Concrete Manual and Part 2 · US Bureau of ReclamationOfficial catalogue only: eighth edition revised reprint 1981/reprinted 1988; Part 2 ninth edition 1992. Large PDFs could not be retrievedLegitimate historical reading sources. No unread manual formula is used in the implementation.
BS EN 206-1:2026 · BSI, published 31 March 2026Current publisher listing and scope §1Specification and production-control framework, not a single mix equation. National provisions matter. The 2021 edition should not be labeled universally current.
Aggregate Gradations for Concrete Pavement Mixtures · Ley/Cook, FHWA-sponsored brief, October 2014Full four-page text, especially pp. 1–3Percent-retained interpretation and limits of idealized grading/voids as workability proxies.
An Innovative Approach to Proportioning Concrete Mixtures · Taylor, Yurdakul, Wang and Wang, March 2015Full research report; method, results and conclusions, pp. 5–6, 24–28, 31Separate aggregate system, paste quality and paste quantity; measured voids matter. Experimental pavement ranges are not universal requirements.
CIP 8: Discrepancies in Yield · NRMCA, revisions through 2016Full two-page publicationFresh yield = actual total batch mass / measured fresh density. Designed volume closure is different from measured batch yield.
Prediction and uncertainty, §4.5.1.2 · NIST/SEMATECH, page undatedComplete handbook sectionConfidence in a mean and uncertainty of a new observation differ. Arbitrary confidence shading around a few trial points is inappropriate.
Understanding EPDs · Hailey Goodale / Colorado DOT / CP Tech Center, Fall 2024Six-page brief; pp. 1–5Declare stages, compatible rules and equivalent function. Ingredient factor sums alone are not complete verified concrete EPDs.
Field Reference Manual for Quality Concrete Pavements · FHWA HIF-13-059Indexed excerpt, printed p. 17; full PDF retrieval failedWater can enter through several ingredients or later additions. Source changes need renewed trial evidence. Used for accounting context only.

Implemented in this release

1. A pinned experiment lab

The user pins the current design and chooses fixed water or fixed binder. An interactive SVG plots calculated binder demand against requested ratio; a keyboard slider provides the same control. A comparison table and dependency chain explain water, binder, paste, aggregates and mixer-water changes. Requested, durability-capped and actual ratios are distinct. Action-level constraints withhold application from this panel. Other warnings remain visible. A downloadable comparison preserves both snapshots and the assumptions.

2. A usable IS trial planner

A direct free-water input now replaces the table/shape/slump/reduction estimate when selected. The planner proposes a revised central trial and the two relative-ratio variations. It keeps revised water fixed and reports when code limits prevent the requested variation. It does not populate workability or strength with simulated observations. Users must measure those properties and adjust actual admixture separately.

3. A water-accounting workbench

A signed water diagram and selectable aggregate walkthrough explain SSD, oven-dry and wet masses. A separate frozen-ticket experiment changes actual stockpile moisture while retaining the old wet batch weights and mixer water. It shows the free-water error, dry-solids error and resulting ratio. Users can then apply the corrected moisture to the current design to issue updated quantities.

4. A measured trial notebook

Records include material series/source references, batch identity/date, age, specimen geometry, curing, slump, replicate strengths and actual batch free-water/binder masses. Optional measured density and actual total mass calculate yield. Matching user-declared material families and testing conditions plot together; replicate ranges are descriptive, not confidence intervals. Records retain proposed design snapshots, persist locally when browser storage is available, and support JSON backup/import and CSV export. No cloud database or AI service receives these records.

5. Grading with percent-retained context

The existing cumulative-passing editor now includes a size-fraction chart. Pan and oversize are included so the fractions total 100%. Numeric selection exposes exact blend and target values. The objective remains target matching, with no automatic packing or workability claim.

What should come later

What should come later
PriorityExtensionEvidence needed before implementation
NextMulti-stockpile constrained blendingValidated mass/SSD conversions for each source, bounds, infeasibility handling and fixtures independent of the solver
NextProject-level provenance and revision historyA clear data schema, permissions, backups and material certificate linkage; current storage is local only
LaterCost and declared-boundary environmental comparisonsUser/supplier factors with units, source, date, geography and lifecycle stages; missing factors must remain missing
LaterStrength-response fitting and uncertaintySufficient comparable measured data, a specified model, residual checks and validated prediction intervals
Separate engineSCC, lightweight, recycled-aggregate, M65+ and international methodsTheir own technical scope, data needs, code/edition audit and independently reviewed numerical fixtures

These priorities are our synthesis, not claims that a publisher endorses this application. Retaining a narrow verified calculation scope is more valuable than adding menu options that imply unsupported concrete families.

Evidence gaps and review boundaries

BIS catalogue discovery identified an IS 456 amendment history including Amendment 6 (2024), but the official amendment PDF link returned 404 during follow-up. This release does not claim that every amendment was audited or that SCM credit constitutes conformity. BSI’s current listing was checked directly. Commercial product performance and paid-book algorithms remain unverified beyond the documents described above.

The numerical review checks independent hand-calculated proportions, fixed-quantity scenarios, infeasible constraints, moisture-ticket errors, relative ±10% trial ratios, measured yield, retained-fraction closure and notebook validation. Type checking and production export checks cover the implementation. These checks do not constitute material testing, independent engineering certification or a browser interaction audit.

  1. Establish the project brief and verify applicable standards and amendments.
  2. Replace demonstration properties with material measurements and supplier evidence.
  3. Select the ratio basis and calculate preliminary quantities; inspect all active limits.
  4. Pin a baseline and explore a specific change with an explicit fixed quantity.
  5. Prepare a moisture-corrected proposed trial, then physically batch and test it.
  6. Record actual quantities, fresh properties and comparable strength specimens.
  7. Review deviations, iterate and obtain project-specific technical approval before production.

Concrete Ratio is an independent learning and preliminary proportioning workspace. It is not affiliated with the software vendors or standards publishers in this report. No paid textbook or full standard is redistributed here.